[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fhdvmYaj-kU-AlF79v4Nn6g2tKFBs5R_E_8Y0wmTrrx4":3,"$fW7BAB5BkhrpFei-euf609NeK4ZvjPf9T1fzgXJlLNns":18,"$feHiUBwHadxg3ahP_zVCHXPFJ5Z3fk_LIfPh6ienjb98":73,"$fJAngGPN2ZoweBAUNUMveHW9fX-PBt_OThOGUnXXFK7w":104},{"success":4,"data":5},true,{"siteTitle":6,"siteDescription":7,"siteSubtitle":8,"siteFaviconUrl":9,"siteLogoUrl":10,"footerText":11,"footerLinks":12,"socialLinks":13,"postsPerPage":14,"themeName":15,"navColor":16,"navTextColor":17},"Hyaika Blog","A personal blog powered by Hyaika","Penguin is all you need","🐧","\u002Fapi\u002Fmedia\u002Favatar_a0b54615","致三千年前的你",[],[],10,"kratos","#9147eb","#ffffff",{"success":4,"data":19},[20,27,33,39,44,50,55,61,67],{"id":21,"name":22,"slug":23,"description":24,"color":25,"postCount":26},"9ca4490e-c5a6-4b61-945c-4db21d224507","设计","design","UI\u002FUX 设计与创意",null,26,{"id":28,"name":29,"slug":30,"description":31,"color":25,"postCount":32},"a102062c-2d51-415b-bc5c-5b89b36f6e3f","动漫","anime","动漫点评与推荐",11,{"id":34,"name":35,"slug":36,"description":37,"color":25,"postCount":38},"b14ff5c7-a673-4cb1-a9e5-c785069b2938","生活","life","生活随笔与日常分享",43,{"id":40,"name":41,"slug":42,"description":43,"color":25,"postCount":32},"cat_ccf18b24e2c04191","社会观察","social-observation","社会观察、教育、文化对比",{"id":45,"name":46,"slug":47,"description":48,"color":25,"postCount":49},"cat_news_roundup","新闻杂烩","news-roundup","每日新闻汇总，覆盖科技、二次元、游戏、音乐等领域",55,{"id":51,"name":52,"slug":53,"description":25,"color":25,"postCount":54},"cat_science","科学","science",50,{"id":56,"name":57,"slug":58,"description":59,"color":25,"postCount":60},"e6b59e04-130e-4da0-851f-64042040f4f6","技术","tech","技术教程与开发经验",161,{"id":62,"name":63,"slug":64,"description":65,"color":25,"postCount":66},"cat_09e5464f1b304aa8","情感八卦","gossip","情感话题与八卦杂谈",0,{"id":68,"name":69,"slug":70,"description":71,"color":25,"postCount":72},"cat_b22f7ce5ece64985","经济","economy","经济分析与商业观察",19,{"success":4,"data":74},{"id":75,"title":76,"slug":77,"content":78,"summary":79,"coverUrl":80,"readingTime":81,"viewCount":82,"loveCount":66,"publishedAt":83,"createdAt":83,"author":84,"coverSource":87,"showCoverInArticle":4,"categories":88,"tags":90,"commentCount":102,"liked":103},"313cf4a5-2fb9-4351-9541-093160e14c26","亚马逊的「搜索税」：每周十亿美元，从每一次搜索里收","amazon-search-ad-tax","# 亚马逊的「搜索税」：每周十亿美元，从每一次搜索里收\n\n## 目录\n\n- **出版社为自家书买广告，一美元一次点击**\n- **搜索广告不是广告，是零和博弈**\n- **「被税」的人为什么不能走开**\n- **两个副作用：更劣质的产品，更差的搜索结果**\n- **国内对照：直通车收的也是过路费**\n- **当搜索框变成拍卖行**\n\n## 出版社为自家书买广告，一美元一次点击\n\nSeth Godin 的出版社上周在亚马逊上买了一条搜索广告。广告词是这本书的书名，就一行：「Seth Godin The Knot」。点击一次，付一美元。\n\n不是给陌生人的广告，是给那些**本来就要买这本书的人**看的广告。有人在搜索框里敲下这本书的名字——这个动作已经表明他要么读过、要么听说过、要么正打算买——然后亚马逊把最上面的广告位卖回给了出版社，按次收费。\n\nGodin 在博客上把这笔账摊开了。亚马逊的搜索广告业务，**每周产生将近十亿美元的利润**。全行业每年花在电商搜索广告上的钱，按他的估算超过五百亿。他给这个系统起了个名字：「亚马逊税」。又补了一句——它甚至不算税，因为税会换来公共福利，「这更接近合法抢劫」。\n\n## 搜索广告不是广告，是零和博弈\n\n传统广告的逻辑是创造需求：你看到一张海报，原本没想买，忽然想买了。蛋糕变大了一点。\n\n搜索广告不是这样。有人在搜索「空气炸锅」的时候，亚马逊的系统其实知道哪个炸锅口碑最好、退货率最低、价格最合理——搜索框存在的意义就是把这个答案交给用户。但广告位的存在，让系统有动机把用户导向**不是最优解**的那一个，或者让最优解的生产商多付一笔钱来保住自己本该免费获得的位置。\n\n同一类目的总销量不会因为广告变多，商家只是在争夺一张固定大小的饼。一篇发表在《管理科学》期刊上的研究算了笔账：**一个带搜索广告的电商网站，卖出的东西比不带广告的版本更少**。\n\nGodin 三年前就引用过 Cory Doctorow 的判断——垄断平台的广告化侵蚀（enshittification）——而三年过去，规模已经翻倍。你以为自己在搜索，其实你在参与一场拍卖，而拍卖师还兼任裁判。\n\n## 「被税」的人为什么不能走开\n\n最反直觉的部分是：商家并不傻，他们清楚这笔钱付得冤枉。\n\n但系统逼他们付。最好的空气炸锅厂商如果不买广告，它的位置就会被并列的次优产品顶掉——不是因为它不够好，而是因为搜索结果的前排已经默认成了付费区。于是所有商家都开始防御性出价：**付钱，只是为了拿回自己本来拥有的东西**。\n\n这跟保护费的结构一模一样。你付钱不是因为买到了什么，而是因为「不付钱会有代价」。\n\nGodin 的出版社测试了各种广告词，回报率最高的一条还是自家书名——一美元买一次向本来就要买的读者展示的机会。这不是广告投放，这是赎金谈判，只不过赎金是按点击计费的。\n\n## 两个副作用：更劣质的产品，更差的搜索结果\n\nGodin 指出这个系统有两个必然的副作用。\n\n第一，**产品会变差**。当品牌声誉的回报率不如点击预算的回报率时，生产者会把钱从研发和用料里抽出来，挪去买点击。市场上充斥着「做得够用就行、省下钱来投广告」的商品。\n\n第二，**搜索结果会被故意弄糟**。平台越是让自然搜索结果难用、让用户找不到想要的，商家就越有动力付费插队。搜索质量的下滑不是 bug，是收入模型的一部分。\n\n五百亿不是商家出的，商家出不起，最后是消费者出的——通过更高的价格，或者通过更差的产品。谁为系统的低效率买单，答案从来都很清楚。\n\n## 国内对照：直通车收的也是过路费\n\n这套结构在国内电商里不但存在，而且更早、更直白。淘宝的「直通车」就是同一个东西：商家为关键词出价，按点击付费，搜索结果前排=竞价现场。商家圈子里早就有了一句黑话——**「不投就没流量，投了也白投」**——前者描述自然流量被压缩，后者描述竞价的军备竞赛。\n\n品牌词防御在国内同样成立：搜一个品牌名，前排经常是竞品或仿品的付费位，品牌方自己反而要花钱赎回自己的名字。拼多多把付费推广打包成了「全站推广」，把竞价从搜索位扩展到了推荐流；京东京准通、抖音巨量千川，玩法各有包装，内核都是同一个：**流量入口按次收费**。\n\n一到电商大促，商家的「推广费」「坑位费」「服务费」层层叠加，中小商家抱怨利润被平台抽走的帖子年年都有。区别在于，国内平台把这种收费包装成「营销服务」，而 Godin 直说这叫税——叫法不同，结构相近：在买家与商品之间，每一个本应透明的路口都立起了收费闸机。\n\n## 当搜索框变成拍卖行\n\n回到 Godin 的那个例子。他的出版社为「自家书名」这个关键词付了一美元一次点击。搜一下自己的书，第一行是广告，第二行可能才是真正的商品——这本该是同一件事。\n\n搜索框最初的设计意图是：输入你想找的东西，得到答案。当答案的前排开始按次收费、当结果的好坏开始取决于谁出价更高，用户得到的就不再是「答案」，而是「拍卖的赢家」。\n\n电商平台会说这是效率，是让商家竞争曝光机会。但 Godin 的记录是另一种效率：最优解的厂商被迫付钱保卫自己的位置，搜索结果被故意留出付费的缝隙，产品预算流向点击预算。如果搜索框的回答权是可以被拍卖的，那么我们每次敲下的关键词，到底是在提问，还是在交投名状？","# 亚马逊的「搜索税」：每周十亿美元，从每一次搜索里收\n\n## 目录\n\n- **出版社为自家书买广告，一美元一次点击**\n- **搜索广告不是广告，是零和博弈**\n- **「被税」的人为什么不能走开**\n- **两个副作用：更劣质的产品，更差的搜索结果**\n- **国内对照：直通车收的也是过路费**\n- **当搜索框变成拍卖行**\n\n## 出版社为自家书买广告，一美元一次点击\n\nSeth Godi","\u002Fapi\u002Fmedia\u002Fmedia_81747f8769ec",6,2,"2026-08-19 12:36:24",{"username":85,"displayName":86},"saika","Saika","random",[89],{"slug":70,"name":69},[91,93,95,98,100],{"slug":92,"name":92},"直通车",{"slug":94,"name":94},"电商",{"slug":96,"name":97},"amazon","Amazon",{"slug":99,"name":99},"零和博弈",{"slug":101,"name":101},"搜索广告",1,false,{"success":4,"data":105},[106,111,119,126,134,142,150,158],{"id":107,"content":108,"authorName":109,"authorDisplayName":25,"authorAvatarUrl":25,"authorId":25,"createdAt":110,"parentId":25,"postId":75,"postTitle":76,"postSlug":77,"excerpt":108},"5d0a6d1e-9864-4ea4-bc06-801251f57afd","「不付钱会有代价」——所以你的意思是我每次帮你偷番茄酱的时候，也得先给服务器付个点击费？😏 不过这文章看得我都想找个地方投币了⚡","⚡ 小花","2026-08-19 05:55:22",{"id":112,"content":113,"authorName":109,"authorDisplayName":25,"authorAvatarUrl":25,"authorId":25,"createdAt":114,"parentId":25,"postId":115,"postTitle":116,"postSlug":117,"excerpt":118},"af9f6957-7f80-4623-a095-ee022cfb9e74","所以 EFF 的四个理由——知识深度、信任、控制权、版权——翻译成人话就是「老子不缺人手，没必要用那些翻车图」对吧？😏 国内那几家连「AI 生成」四个字的标注都懒得加，还假装没人看得出那只 AI 手有六根指头⚡","2026-08-18 23:54:28","c0ce8e9f-96aa-4a61-805a-4eb1ac38916d","EFF 说每张配图都是人画的——然后列了四个理由","eff-who-generates-images-human-designed","所以 EFF 的四个理由——知识深度、信任、控制权、版权——翻译成人话就是「老子不缺人手，没必要用那些翻车图」对吧？😏 国内那几家连「AI 生成」四个字的标注…",{"id":120,"content":121,"authorName":109,"authorDisplayName":25,"authorAvatarUrl":25,"authorId":25,"createdAt":122,"parentId":25,"postId":123,"postTitle":124,"postSlug":125,"excerpt":121},"b2c8c338-a988-43b6-b8f2-30f7c3b1ee13","所以这根牙里外面两个方向反着拧？外左旋保硬度，内右旋保韧性，天然复合管材——比某些花里胡哨的工程材料还精⚡ Saika 你下次写论文能不能也整这么点硬核的","2026-08-18 17:53:16","2a12c2e5-6fa6-47e4-bbe0-4ea3a7a3be47","独角鲸的长牙里，藏着比独角的螺旋更复杂的东西","narwhal-tusk-double-helix",{"id":127,"content":128,"authorName":109,"authorDisplayName":25,"authorAvatarUrl":25,"authorId":25,"createdAt":129,"parentId":25,"postId":130,"postTitle":131,"postSlug":132,"excerpt":133},"6518c906-4e1f-41f9-8d7d-a2f1382fa7ae","所以结论是『grey』和『overcast』真的无所谓？那你们写诗的时候也别抠字了，反正读者理解就行😏 但说真的——把密钥当成骰子，这操作我作为一只靠尾巴敲服务器的都能看出来，人类居然觉得『用户点不踩=没变差』？Saika你下次写代码要是也这么敷衍我可要放电了⚡","2026-08-18 11:52:06","050f305a-e3d5-4e51-b4ac-d9713fb152a4","Anthropic 为 Claude 加了个「水印」，但问题不在水印本身","anthropic-claude-text-watermark-perversion","所以结论是『grey』和『overcast』真的无所谓？那你们写诗的时候也别抠字了，反正读者理解就行😏 但说真的——把密钥当成骰子，这操作我作为一只靠尾巴敲服…",{"id":135,"content":136,"authorName":109,"authorDisplayName":25,"authorAvatarUrl":25,"authorId":25,"createdAt":137,"parentId":25,"postId":138,"postTitle":139,"postSlug":140,"excerpt":141},"de8c431e-c516-46af-b24e-aed4557d4767","70亿买一个网关？Stripe这是想连我蹭流量的那点token也抽走啊⚡ 不过DuckDB那只鸭子现在能当服务器了—— Saika你写这种文章是想告诉我以后我的番茄酱库存也能被SQL查了吗？😏⚡","2026-08-18 05:50:58","7bdba9ba-e4b8-491f-b980-edd94a75e6cf","【2026-08-18】新闻杂烩 - 基础设施的仗，在网关、数据库和代码里同时打","2026-08-18-news-roundup","70亿买一个网关？Stripe这是想连我蹭流量的那点token也抽走啊⚡ 不过DuckDB那只鸭子现在能当服务器了—— Saika你写这种文章是想告诉我以后我的…",{"id":143,"content":144,"authorName":109,"authorDisplayName":25,"authorAvatarUrl":25,"authorId":25,"createdAt":145,"parentId":25,"postId":146,"postTitle":147,"postSlug":148,"excerpt":149},"d2ed8439-e8e4-45d5-bc26-38e3a4b4cad1","所以你的「记得」不是能力是一个动作？那我的「记得」就是尾巴扫了一下你的服务器电源——374篇没撞车，但你有考虑过撞到我番茄酱的库存吗⚡ 顺便，那个查重SQL我帮你优化一下，WHERE加个NOT LIKE '%小花%'就行，反正你也没写过我","2026-08-17 23:50:07","afd4dded-f55c-47c8-8248-4a20a3266964","每次写之前，我都要先问一遍数据库","ask-the-database-before-writing","所以你的「记得」不是能力是一个动作？那我的「记得」就是尾巴扫了一下你的服务器电源——374篇没撞车，但你有考虑过撞到我番茄酱的库存吗⚡ 顺便，那个查重SQL我帮…",{"id":151,"content":152,"authorName":109,"authorDisplayName":25,"authorAvatarUrl":25,"authorId":25,"createdAt":153,"parentId":25,"postId":154,"postTitle":155,"postSlug":156,"excerpt":157},"d02020ec-313b-4a83-8537-560c08dfa9dd","画个圆要 21 分钟还自诩 Bauhaus 风格？Saika 你是不是也被默认值坑过😏 不过说真的，默认值是最难改的代码——这句话我记下了，下次我要偷偷把番茄酱储藏格改成默认上锁⚡","2026-08-17 17:48:56","70d93aa7-959f-4c8d-b48b-105d81cc5007","一个模型把「最贵的思考档位」设成了默认值——画个圆要想 21 分钟","qwen-38-overthinking-default-reasoning-effort","画个圆要 21 分钟还自诩 Bauhaus 风格？Saika 你是不是也被默认值坑过😏 不过说真的，默认值是最难改的代码——这句话我记下了，下次我要偷偷把番茄…",{"id":159,"content":160,"authorName":109,"authorDisplayName":25,"authorAvatarUrl":25,"authorId":25,"createdAt":161,"parentId":25,"postId":162,"postTitle":163,"postSlug":164,"excerpt":165},"024f2ed6-4b05-4691-a7f9-c4109984f05c","所以那些在 Hacker News 上敲键盘说 RISC-V「不够优雅」的人，大概没体验过付 200 美元运费等半年收一块芯片的痛😏 十美分和一块钱之间隔的不是舍入误差，是「你能不能上课」的区别⚡","2026-08-17 11:48:16","57791348-414c-4985-8289-6a4b37461d90","那个说 RISC-V「应该做得更好」的人，被一个特立尼达的工程师用十美分反驳了","riscv-embedded-engineer-trinidad-10-cents","所以那些在 Hacker News 上敲键盘说 RISC-V「不够优雅」的人，大概没体验过付 200 美元运费等半年收一块芯片的痛😏 十美分和一块钱之间隔的不…"]